Preventing hepatitis B virus infection among healthcare professionals: potential impact of a 2-dose versus 3-dose vaccine.

The exposure risk to the highly infectious hepatitis B virus (HBV) is an established and recognizable hazard to healthcare professionals (HCPs). In the United States, implementing preemptive vaccination programs and safety procedures resulted in drastic reductions in HBV infections among HCPs; however, many HCPs remain unprotected and risk of exposure persists, especially among those first entering a healthcare system and undergoing professional training. First-generation HBV vaccines require completion of a 3-dose schedule over a 6-month interval for maximum immunogenicity. By comparison, HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B®) is a 2-dose HBV vaccine licensed in the United States in 2017, inducing rapid seroprotection over a 1-month interval and may represent a more effective strategy for combating HBV infection in US healthcare systems. In this modeling study, the health and economic impact of implementing an HBV vaccination strategy with HepB-CpG versus the 3-dose HBV vaccine (Engerix-B®) was evaluated among HCPs newly entering a healthcare system. The model used effective seroprotection rate, a real-world metric accounting for HCP vaccine compliance and seroprotection rates for different dosing regimens and considered current pricing for postexposure prophylaxis treatment. Compared with the 3-dose vaccine, HepB-CpG was anticipated to provide faster, increased protection against HBV infection among newly entered HCPs. In protecting a greater percentage of HCPs, HepB-CpG was also projected to substantially reduce the risk of HBV exposure. Accordingly, an economic analysis showed HepB-CpG vaccination would reduce costs of postexposure prophylaxis treatment compared with the 3-dose vaccine. Overall, HepB-CpG represents an effective therapeutic strategy against HBV infection for US healthcare systems.

Considerations for estimating real-world outcomes and value in vaccination: A case study with adult hepatitis B virus vaccination.

BACKGROUND: In the absence of field efficacy studies, estimating the real-world effectiveness of vaccines may consider immunogenicity from randomized controlled clinical trials and real-world adherence. Combining seroprotection rates (SPRs) with regimen completion rates gives an estimate of an effective vaccine protection rate (eVPR), which can be leveraged to evaluate real-world cost-effectiveness by linking it with vaccine costs to estimate the cost-per-protected patient (CPP). METHODS: This study evaluated eVPR and CPP as estimates of vaccine clinical- and cost-effectiveness of two-dose (HepB-CpG) and three-dose (HepB-Alum) hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccines in the general adult population and a subpopulation with diabetes mellitus. eVPR was calculated from head-to-head SPR data from phase 3 clinical trials directly comparing HepB-CpG and HepB-Alum vaccine regimens and real-world head-to-head adherence data. CPP was calculated as the average cost of each regimen divided by eVPR. RESULTS: Higher eVPR in the adult population was achieved with HepB-CpG (68.0%) versus HepB-Alum (41.6%), reflecting the combination of higher SPR and vaccine regimen completion. The CPP for HepB-CpG ($331.31) was $45.67 (95% CI: $36.66, $55.19) less than HepB-Alum ($377.09). Greater savings were observed among persons with diabetes, with CPP $149.60 (95% CI: $80.29, $195.63) lower with HepB-CpG ($367.57) than HepB-Alum ($517.37). CONCLUSIONS: Metrics estimating vaccine real-world effectiveness and value may guide informed decisions in vaccine selection. For example, using eVPR and CPP, HepB-CpG represents a more effective, value-advantaged approach than HepB-Alum toward reducing HBV infection.